Review Process
Key Considerations for Reviewers:
Expertise Alignment
Ensure that the article matches your area of expertise, enabling a thorough and insightful review.
Time Management
Allocate sufficient time for reviewing each article, considering deadlines and workload constraints.
Confidentiality
Maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts by refraining from sharing them with unauthorized individuals.
Objectivity
Approach the review with an objective mindset, aligning your assessment with the article's content and the journal's requirements.
Reasonable Feedback
Provide feedback supported by logical reasoning, ensuring the validity and relevance of your comments.
Communication with the Editor:
- Concise Reporting: Keep your report focused on essential aspects of the article, avoiding unnecessary length.
- Adherence to Journal Standards: Ensure that your review acknowledges and aligns with the journal's standards and guidelines.
- Submission to Editor: Share your review with the editor promptly, adhering to the specified submission process.
- Comprehensive Recommendations: Provide clear recommendations to the editor, whether it involves acceptance, revision, or rejection, considering both specific article aspects and general observations.
Peer-Review Deadline:
Timely Completion: Aim to complete the review process, including recommendations, within the designated timeframe of 7 days.
Professional Integrity: Adhering to deadlines demonstrates professionalism and contributes to timely publication, benefiting both authors and the scholarly community.